Challenge
Efficient investment in food system research necessitates an understanding of the costs and potential benefits of alternative projects. Estimating the ex-ante returns to technological innovation requires information on the financial benefits over the status quo, the likelihood of adoption and the time lag between development and widescale penetration in target environments. Combining this information with the costs of the project allows calculation of the benefits accruing to producers and consumers.
Solution
The economics project is designed to provide strategic information to the management team as they assess alternative project proposals and research strategies. Owing to the value-chain strategy of the Sorghum and Millet Innovation Lab, this project requires skills to assess the impact of embodied technologies like new seed varieties, crop and resource management techniques and consumer demand for new food products. Many projects in the economics portfolio are designed to examine one element of the innovation challenge and are ideally suited for student projects.
Funding
This project and research was funded by the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sorghum and Millet, known as the Sorghum and Millet Innovation Lab (SMIL). This lab is funded by USAID and managed at Kansas State University.
Award Amount
$350,259 (2013 - 2023)
Research Team
Timothy Dalton Manzamasso Hodjo
Keith Fuglie Etaferahu Kassa Ejetu
Yacob Zereyesus Tebila Nakelese
U.S.A. collaborating institutions
Kansas State University
International collaborating institutions
Ethiopia - Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR)
Niger - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN)
Senegal - Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (ISRA)
Principal Investigator
Dr. Timothy J. Dalton
Kansas State University
Director of the Sorghum and Millet Innovation Lab
Professor of Agricultural Economics
Phone: 785-477-8239
Email: [email protected]
National Impact
Burkina Faso
Ethiopia
Haiti
Mali
Niger
Senegal
Togo
Project Description
Sorghum and millet farmers face numerous challenges to improve productivity including biotic and abiotic production constraints, market access and competing usages for labor and time. Understanding the opportunities and challenges for new agricultural technologies to alleviate some of these constraints is one area of inquiry in the economics portfolio. Many studies in this area conduct ex-ante and ex-post assessments of new seeds and crop and resource management techniques. A second area of inquiry is on understanding the opportunities for adding value to sorghum and pearl millet through food processing and new food product development. Sorghum and pearl millet are important substitutes for expensive alternatives like wheat and teff. Considerable research examines consumer demand for new food products and the development of new opportunities for entrepreneurs. A third line of study examines the trends in sorghum and pearl millet production, consumption and trade at regional and international levels. These trends are complemented with strategic reviews on the factors affecting agricultural productivity including the impact of investment trends.Progress and Impact
Several studies have been completed to better understand the potential welfare impact of alternative investment strategies. A meta-analysis on the returns to research investment in sorghum and millet science found a average rate of return across all studies ranging from 54-76% even within austere growing environments. Dr. Tebila Nakelse completed a dissertation studying the demand for extruded food products manufactured by small-scale entrepreneurs in Niger. This research segmented the urban consumer market and found that there were two main segments of the market. One segment was willing to pay a premium for extruded products that reduced cooking time while the second did not. The segment valuing the extruded product was wealthier and employed in the formal sector while the price-conscious group, the majority of consumers, were generally poorer and younger.The Des Moines Register Opinion Editorial
Proactive approach from USAID would enable universities to help head off hunger crises
Research Paper
Costs, Benefits, and Welfare Implications of USAID Investment in Agricultural Research through U.S. Universities
Country Coordinators
Dr. Alemu Tirfessa
Coordinator
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR)
Dr. Ndjido Kane
Director & Coordinator
Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles du Senegal (ISRA)
Dr. Moustapha Moussa
Coordinator
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN)
